Skip to main content

Why South American Clubs are no longer a threat in the FIFA Club World Cup

Image
By

 


The South American clubs are no longer the favourite to end UEFA’s domination in the FIFA Club World Cup.

The 2025 FIFA Club World Cup is set to begin at the end of this week. This expanded edition is expected to bring more competitive games and rekindle heated rivalries at the latter stage between UEFA and CONMEBOL sides. However, the latter reason seems rather out of reach considering the decline of the South American teams.

Their dipped performance in the tournament, which was once known in a one-off showdown between the UCL and Copa Libertadores champions, has been quite distressing. The last time CONMEBOL lifted the trophy was in 2012 when Corinthians snatched a scrappy 1-0 victory over Chelsea under Tite. Since then, Copa Libertadores champions have not always reached the final in the competition. In fact, in the past five editions, only three of them advanced to the summit.

No wonder that many have doubts they could win again, including in this year’s edition when CONMEBOL are represented by six teams. They are just half of the UEFA teams, which are likely to dominate again, probably from the last four.

Will Palmeiras, Flamengo, Fluminense, and Botafogo, plus River Plate and Boca Juniors, stand no chance to even progress further, or will they bounce back this time? None can tell, but their quality really raises the eyebrows compared to the European sides, and such appear to be justified by the reasons below.

The Big Gap with Europe

The most obvious one would be the big gap between two regions in terms of almost everything. In the football world, the gap mainly stems from the infrastructure, coaching and tactical development.

South Americans may boast of their talents, but when it comes to the clubs’ facilities, Europe is simply better. They have a better system and more modern infrastructure with more tech support to improve players’ performance as well as the teams. The players’ strengths and weaknesses plus potential injuries can be detected almost instantly with the assistance of various apps.

In terms of coaching and tactical development, Europe is certainly thriving. They have better sources and a deeper pool of talents in managerial positions. European teams have been ahead of their contenders with updated coaching, which can balance between developing technical and physical aspects. Such has been applied to the younger players as well.

In South America, technical qualities are seemingly still prioritised over the physical aspects. The former Boca Juniors goalkeeper, Carlos Montoya, appears to agree on this, which has been creating quite a setback. Such a mindset has been going on for years, and the change has only been initiated recently.

Their Young Talents' Premature Move to Europe

Another crucial factor which leads to a big gap between South American and European teams is the young talents paradox. The CONMEBOL sides, especially Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay, have been well-known for being the home of great football talents. In the past, they were nurtured by the local clubs before eventually spreading their wings to the other continent when they were mature enough. They most likely made a big move to Europe in their early 20s.

Today, the European giants have started their hunt for Latin America's young stars without waiting for them to shine in major youth competitions like the FIFA U20 World Cup. They roam to their wilderness and look to sign the raw talents to be exported before they even reach the age of 20.

The likes of Vinicius Jr, Rodrygo, Endrick, Vitor Roque and lastly, Estevao from Brazil and Argentina’s Emiliano Martinez, Claudio Echeverri, even Lionel Messi himself and most recently Franco Mastantuono have already departed to Europe before even winning prestigious trophies with their first local sides.

Such a trend is likely to continue and would definitely cost South American teams' performance when facing off against the European giants. Thus, despite their higher enthusiasm to compete the FIFA Club World Cup, they do not likely stand a chance to even reach the summit.

So, unless the European teams were willing to let them happen by fielding more players from the reserved teams and ‘embracing defeat’ soon so that they head to the exit earlier and return home sooner for resting their players, the South Americans will still be going home empty-handed at the end of the tournament.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

1981 U20 World Cup – The Stage for The Underdogs

By
  The 1981 U20 World Cup, held in Australia, became a showcase for underdog teams that had not been expected to shine. The 1981 edition of the junior world cup was perhaps the first time that surprises dominated the tournament — including the eventual champions, West Germany. Although they came from the UEFA zone and had a strong winning tradition, especially at senior level, they were not actually supposed to qualify for the finals. Their story mirrored Denmark’s success at Euro 1992. Even more astonishing was the emergence of an Asian team that made it to the final for the first time in the history of the U20 championship. Facts and Figures from the 1981 U20 World Cup The third edition of the U20 World Cup featured several unique stories, no less intriguing than other editions. Here are some highlights from the first FIFA competition to be staged in Oceania: * The tournament took place from 3 to 18 October with 16 teams divided into four groups. * A total of 32 matches...
Post a Comment
Read more

1983 U20 World Cup – When Stadiums Were Packed with Fans

By
  The 1983 U20 World Cup is remembered for its success in drawing huge crowds to the stadiums, just like senior-level tournaments.   Youth World Cup had generally struggled to attract fans to attend matches and support their countries — something almost unthinkable in senior international tournaments. That was the case in the first three editions. However, the 1983 U20 World Cup managed to break that trend. The average attendance per match reached 36,099 spectators, a record that still stands today. In some games, more than 100,000 fans turned up to watch their teams live. Facts and Figures from the 1983 U20 World Cup   The 1983 edition had its own share of interesting facts, just like those before and after. Here are the highlights from the first junior world cup held in the Americas: * The tournament took place from 2 to 19 June with 16 teams divided into four groups. * A total of 32 matches were played throughout the tournament. * The host cities were Guad...
Post a Comment
Read more

1979 U20 World Cup, The Coronation of Maradona

By
  The 1979 U20 World Cup became the most talked-about edition for one reason: the official emergence of Diego Armando Maradona. After being snubbed by Cesar Luis Menotti for the seniorteam in the 1978 FIFA World Cup in his own home soil because he was considered too young , Maradona was finally given his stage by Menotti. The World Cup winning manager named him the captain and tasked to lead the team to glory. He accomplished the mission perfectly. El Diego played a major role throughout the tournament, leading the Tango team to their first title and being awarded Best Player—similar to the 1986 World Cup. The 1979 U20 World Cup Fact and Figures The second edition of the U20 World Cup had a number of interesting facts compared to other editions. Here are some highlights of the first junior world cup held in Asia: * The competition was held from August 26 to September 7 with 16 participants divided into four groups. * A total of 32 matches were played throughout the tourna...
Post a Comment
Read more