Skip to main content

Why South American Clubs are no longer a threat in the FIFA Club World Cup

Image
By

 


The South American clubs are no longer the favourite to end UEFA’s domination in the FIFA Club World Cup.

The 2025 FIFA Club World Cup is set to begin at the end of this week. This expanded edition is expected to bring more competitive games and rekindle heated rivalries at the latter stage between UEFA and CONMEBOL sides. However, the latter reason seems rather out of reach considering the decline of the South American teams.

Their dipped performance in the tournament, which was once known in a one-off showdown between the UCL and Copa Libertadores champions, has been quite distressing. The last time CONMEBOL lifted the trophy was in 2012 when Corinthians snatched a scrappy 1-0 victory over Chelsea under Tite. Since then, Copa Libertadores champions have not always reached the final in the competition. In fact, in the past five editions, only three of them advanced to the summit.

No wonder that many have doubts they could win again, including in this year’s edition when CONMEBOL are represented by six teams. They are just half of the UEFA teams, which are likely to dominate again, probably from the last four.

Will Palmeiras, Flamengo, Fluminense, and Botafogo, plus River Plate and Boca Juniors, stand no chance to even progress further, or will they bounce back this time? None can tell, but their quality really raises the eyebrows compared to the European sides, and such appear to be justified by the reasons below.

The Big Gap with Europe

The most obvious one would be the big gap between two regions in terms of almost everything. In the football world, the gap mainly stems from the infrastructure, coaching and tactical development.

South Americans may boast of their talents, but when it comes to the clubs’ facilities, Europe is simply better. They have a better system and more modern infrastructure with more tech support to improve players’ performance as well as the teams. The players’ strengths and weaknesses plus potential injuries can be detected almost instantly with the assistance of various apps.

In terms of coaching and tactical development, Europe is certainly thriving. They have better sources and a deeper pool of talents in managerial positions. European teams have been ahead of their contenders with updated coaching, which can balance between developing technical and physical aspects. Such has been applied to the younger players as well.

In South America, technical qualities are seemingly still prioritised over the physical aspects. The former Boca Juniors goalkeeper, Carlos Montoya, appears to agree on this, which has been creating quite a setback. Such a mindset has been going on for years, and the change has only been initiated recently.

Their Young Talents' Premature Move to Europe

Another crucial factor which leads to a big gap between South American and European teams is the young talents paradox. The CONMEBOL sides, especially Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay, have been well-known for being the home of great football talents. In the past, they were nurtured by the local clubs before eventually spreading their wings to the other continent when they were mature enough. They most likely made a big move to Europe in their early 20s.

Today, the European giants have started their hunt for Latin America's young stars without waiting for them to shine in major youth competitions like the FIFA U20 World Cup. They roam to their wilderness and look to sign the raw talents to be exported before they even reach the age of 20.

The likes of Vinicius Jr, Rodrygo, Endrick, Vitor Roque and lastly, Estevao from Brazil and Argentina’s Emiliano Martinez, Claudio Echeverri, even Lionel Messi himself and most recently Franco Mastantuono have already departed to Europe before even winning prestigious trophies with their first local sides.

Such a trend is likely to continue and would definitely cost South American teams' performance when facing off against the European giants. Thus, despite their higher enthusiasm to compete the FIFA Club World Cup, they do not likely stand a chance to even reach the summit.

So, unless the European teams were willing to let them happen by fielding more players from the reserved teams and ‘embracing defeat’ soon so that they head to the exit earlier and return home sooner for resting their players, the South Americans will still be going home empty-handed at the end of the tournament.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

1983 U20 World Cup – When Stadiums Were Packed with Fans

By
  The 1983 U20 World Cup is remembered for its success in drawing huge crowds to the stadiums, just like senior-level tournaments.   Youth World Cup had generally struggled to attract fans to attend matches and support their countries — something almost unthinkable in senior international tournaments. That was the case in the first three editions. However, the 1983 U20 World Cup managed to break that trend. The average attendance per match reached 36,099 spectators, a record that still stands today. In some games, more than 100,000 fans turned up to watch their teams live. Facts and Figures from the 1983 U20 World Cup   The 1983 edition had its own share of interesting facts, just like those before and after. Here are the highlights from the first junior world cup held in the Americas: * The tournament took place from 2 to 19 June with 16 teams divided into four groups. * A total of 32 matches were played throughout the tournament. * The host cities were Guad...
Post a Comment
Read more

1991 FIFA U-20 World Cup: A One-of-a-Kind Edition

By
  The 1991 FIFA U-20 World Cup was unlike any other, marked by unique circumstances surrounding the host nation and the wider historical events of the era. Unprecedented factors defined the tournament: the surprising performance of teams from Oceania and Asia, extraordinary political developments, and, most notably, the appointment of defending champions Portugal as hosts. To this day, they remain the only reigning champions to have staged the U-20 World Cup—or any FIFA World Cup.  Originally, Nigeria had been awarded hosting rights, but the country was stripped of the tournament after being found guilty of age falsification involving three players at the 1988 Olympic Games. FIFA suspended Nigeria for two years, removing them from international football and transferring hosting rights to Portugal. Key Facts – 1991 Tournament * Held from 14 to 30 June, with 16 teams split into four groups. * Matches were staged in Porto, Lisbon, Braga, Guimarães and Faro. * For the fi...
Post a Comment
Read more

1989 FIFA U-20 World Cup: The Emergence of Portugal

By
  The 1989 FIFA U-20 World Cup marked the dawn of Portugal’s resurgence in world football, as a new generation delivered the nation’s first international title. Portugal had enjoyed a golden period in the mid-1960s, when Eusébio inspired them to the World Cup semi-finals in 1966, but the national side then faded from prominence. A revival began in the 1980s at club level, with Benfica and Porto reaching European finals—Porto famously winning the European Cup in 1987. The national team also showed promise at Euro 1984, reaching the semi-finals, before suffering a humiliating collapse at the 1986 World Cup amid the “Saltillo scandal.” Failure to qualify for Euro 1988 left Portuguese football in crisis. Against that backdrop, the triumph of Carlos Queiroz’s promising young squad in Saudi Arabia offered a glimpse of a brighter future for the Seleção das Quinas. Key Facts – 1989 Tournament   The 1989 edition carried several notable features: * Held from 16 February to 3 Mar...
Post a Comment
Read more