Skip to main content

The Withdrawn Teams and their Replacements in World Cup History

 


A number of teams did need to withdraw from the World Cup for several reasons and were replaced in the final round.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup is only four months away, but the latest developments around the globe and in the host nations raise concerns about whether the tournament will ever continue to be held in North America. After the violence in Guadalajara, one of the city hosts in Mexico, the US military strikes to support Israel on Iran’s soil hit deeper than just political issues, especially following the departure of their religious Supreme Leader recently.

Iran has reportedly been in doubt about participating in the current FIFA World Cup, as they are based in the USA. The travel restriction for Iran’s fans to US home soil could definitely trigger a worsening of the situation. 

FIFA has yet to decide team Melli's fate in the final round, as well as their replacement. Iraq and UEA have been deemed the potential one on the list. 

 Throughout the tournament’s history, several teams had to withdraw for different reasons. Most of them were replaced by their direct oppositions, but a few simply lost their berth as their replacement opted to decline the opportunity. Here are those teams which experienced such circumstances, plus their story beyond.

However, only the teams whose withdrawal had a direct impact on their opponent’s chance to qualify directly count here, while those which declined to play at the early stage of the qualifiers will not be included.

Italy 1934 (three nations)

In the second edition of the FIFA World Cup, Italy 1934, the qualifying round was firstly introduced for all contestants, including the host. However, several nations opted to withdraw from the qualifiers, with specifically three nations from South America choosing to do so voluntarily.

The reigning champion, Uruguay, refused to travel as a sign of protest to their European counterparts due to their rejection of participating in the previous edition, even by invitation. Meanwhile, Peru and Chile withdrew because of logistic and financial reasons. Such led Brazil and Argentina to take their place. They were their direct opposition in the qualifiers with only a single game for two berths for CONMEBOL.

France 1938 (five nations)

In the following edition, more nations opted to withdraw from the tournament. Uruguay remained absent from the qualifying round; Argentina followed their neighbouring rival’s footsteps, as they felt dismayed by FIFA’s decision to be more in favour of Europe instead.

The 1938 edition was supposed to be given to CONMEBOL due to the expected turn.

Unfortunately, the world football governing body was more in favour of Europe, with France as the elected host, instead of Argentina, which had already applied for the host. Consequently, Brazil was taking Albiceleste’s place.

Apparently, they were not the only team withdrawing from the competition at the expense of the other team securing the berth by walking over. Egypt and Cuba were the ones who did and were replaced by the USA and Romania.

Meanwhile, Austria was unable to send their team due to the ‘Anschluss’ despite being qualified. They were colonised by Germany. Their spot was initially given to England by invitation path. However, the FA declined, as they saw it lacked prestige compared to their own British Home Championship.

Brazil 1950 (ten nations)

The first edition of the FIFA World Cup after World War II was also not immune to the withdrawal issue. Ten nations decided to decline to send their team in the competition due to various reasons, including two elite sides.

Argentina was one of them. Albiceleste was involved in a political disagreement with Brazil, resulting in their rejection of taking part in the 1950 edition. Peru and Ecuador also opted for the same but with different motives. Their absence gave the advantage for Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia and Chile to take their berth.

Meanwhile, from UEFA, France also declined to go, despite replacing the withdrawing Scotland because of the travelling schedule. Portugal, which was supposed to take two consecutive teams which withdrew, Austria and then Turkey, did the same, whereas Switzerland qualified at the expense of Belgium. They were not in their ideal circumstance to send the team after suffering the world war.

The weirdest team withdrawing from the world cup was India. The South Asian side qualified through walkover win following Burma's withdrawal. Nevertheless, they eventually opted not to play themselves due to their obligation to wear boots!! India preferred to play with barefeet but such proposal was rejected by FIFA despite their fairly successful campaign in summer Olympics 1948 without boots on the pitch.

Switzerland 1954 (one nation)

In the following edition, Poland became the only team to withdraw at that time. They declined to play against Hungary in a two-legged qualifying match mainly due to internal non-sporting reasons, which was quite a shock. As a result, the Mighty Magyar went through the final round without even having to kick the ball.

Apart from Poland, Argentina also continued to decline playing in the qualifiers. However, their absence did not instantly impact the other teams’ success in qualifying, as only two berths were available for the CONMEBOL side.

West Germany 1974 (one nation)

The last team to withdraw from the crucial stage of the World Cup leading to the direct berth in the final round was the USSR. The Eastern Europe giant rejected playing in Santiago for the second leg of the intercontinental playoff for the sake of their own security following the coup of Augusto Pinochet. The former Chilean president was infamous for executing people in the national stadium, in which the USSR and Chile were scheduled to square off.

They requested FIFA name a different venue for the match, but an agreement could not be reached. The Soviet Union was eventually disqualified, as they remained firm on their refusal at the expense of Chile’s return to the FIFA World Cup after their absence in Mexico 1970.

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Renowned Goalkeepers who won Gold Medals at the Olympics

  Top goalkeepers who have won Olympic gold medals are extremely rare throughout the tournament's history. Football appears to be destined as the Olympics' secondary global tournament. Despite its distinguished status, it is not on the FIFA international calendar. As a result, those involved in the competition, from players to managers, are either past their prime or have yet to become well-known. Due to the Olympics' schedule, top players, particularly those between the sticks, are unlikely to compete. The goalkeepers named to the squad are mostly understudies or veterans from the senior teams. It's no surprise that only a few of them eventually received gold medals. The last renowned shot stoppers to win medals at the Olympics were Mexico’s Guillermo Ochoa and Spain’s Unai Simon. The former earned a bronze medal in the Tokyo 2020 summer Olympics after beating the host, Japan, in third place , while the latter only received a silver medal as he was unable to help Sp...

The Notable Short Goalkeepers at the Top Level in History

  A few short goalkeepers did manage to make their mark at the top level, but not anymore today. A goalkeeper has been a crucial position in football, and height has become a more and more important requirement to be a shot stopper, especially at the top level. In addition, goalkeepers have been pushed to have ball control and reading the game ability as they tend to be integrated in attacking build-up in the modern game. Regarding the height, it is almost impossible to find a man between the sticks who is below 175 cm tall. The shortest goalkeeper in the European top five is still 180 cm tall. He is the current Real Valladolid man, Jordi Masip. Nevertheless, there have been such notable short goalies at the top level in football history. Two of them even got a nod to feature in two FIFA World Cup finals. Here are those distinguished shot stoppers without the height advantage but still managed to be the first choice in his club and earn international caps. Juan Botasso (Argen...

The Most Entertaining Finals in Football at the Olympics

 A few finals in football at the Olympics have been regarded as the most entertaining ones as they produced goals galore. Goals are undoubtedly the source of excitement in football. No wonder that goal galore is always preferable to stalemate. The 2022 FIFA World Cup final is one recent example. Both sides traded goals, resulting in a high-scoring draw of 3-3. It is the first in World Cup history as well as considered the most entertaining one. In football at the Olympics, the goal galore has not taken place for a while. In fact, in the past 20 years, only a few goals have been scored. In Paris 2024, the fans would surely expect the clash between France and Spain to end more like the 2022 World Cup final than the 2024 EURO final, although that does not necessarily mean the latter match is less interesting than the former. Nevertheless, the goals always prevail in the eyes of the fans. Here are the four most entertaining finals in football at the Olympics that produced four go...