Skip to main content

The Withdrawn Teams and their Replacements in World Cup History

 


A number of teams did need to withdraw from the World Cup for several reasons and were replaced in the final round.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup is only four months away, but the latest developments around the globe and in the host nations raise concerns about whether the tournament will ever continue to be held in North America. After the violence in Guadalajara, one of the city hosts in Mexico, the US military strikes to support Israel on Iran’s soil hit deeper than just political issues, especially following the departure of their religious Supreme Leader recently.

Iran has reportedly been in doubt about participating in the current FIFA World Cup, as they are based in the USA. The travel restriction for Iran’s fans to US home soil could definitely trigger a worsening of the situation. 

FIFA has yet to decide team Melli's fate in the final round, as well as their replacement. Iraq and UEA have been deemed the potential one on the list. 

 Throughout the tournament’s history, several teams had to withdraw for different reasons. Most of them were replaced by their direct oppositions, but a few simply lost their berth as their replacement opted to decline the opportunity. Here are those teams which experienced such circumstances, plus their story beyond.

However, only the teams whose withdrawal had a direct impact on their opponent’s chance to qualify directly count here, while those which declined to play at the early stage of the qualifiers will not be included.

Italy 1934 (three nations)

In the second edition of the FIFA World Cup, Italy 1934, the qualifying round was firstly introduced for all contestants, including the host. However, several nations opted to withdraw from the qualifiers, with specifically three nations from South America choosing to do so voluntarily.

The reigning champion, Uruguay, refused to travel as a sign of protest to their European counterparts due to their rejection of participating in the previous edition, even by invitation. Meanwhile, Peru and Chile withdrew because of logistic and financial reasons. Such led Brazil and Argentina to take their place. They were their direct opposition in the qualifiers with only a single game for two berths for CONMEBOL.

France 1938 (five nations)

In the following edition, more nations opted to withdraw from the tournament. Uruguay remained absent from the qualifying round; Argentina followed their neighbouring rival’s footsteps, as they felt dismayed by FIFA’s decision to be more in favour of Europe instead.

The 1938 edition was supposed to be given to CONMEBOL due to the expected turn.

Unfortunately, the world football governing body was more in favour of Europe, with France as the elected host, instead of Argentina, which had already applied for the host. Consequently, Brazil was taking Albiceleste’s place.

Apparently, they were not the only team withdrawing from the competition at the expense of the other team securing the berth by walking over. Egypt and Cuba were the ones who did and were replaced by the USA and Romania.

Meanwhile, Austria was unable to send their team due to the ‘Anschluss’ despite being qualified. They were colonised by Germany. Their spot was initially given to England by invitation path. However, the FA declined, as they saw it lacked prestige compared to their own British Home Championship.

Brazil 1950 (ten nations)

The first edition of the FIFA World Cup after World War II was also not immune to the withdrawal issue. Ten nations decided to decline to send their team in the competition due to various reasons, including two elite sides.

Argentina was one of them. Albiceleste was involved in a political disagreement with Brazil, resulting in their rejection of taking part in the 1950 edition. Peru and Ecuador also opted for the same but with different motives. Their absence gave the advantage for Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia and Chile to take their berth.

Meanwhile, from UEFA, France also declined to go, despite replacing the withdrawing Scotland because of the travelling schedule. Portugal, which was supposed to take two consecutive teams which withdrew, Austria and then Turkey, did the same, whereas Switzerland qualified at the expense of Belgium. They were not in their ideal circumstance to send the team after suffering the world war.

The weirdest team withdrawing from the world cup was India. The South Asian side qualified through walkover win following Burma's withdrawal. Nevertheless, they eventually opted not to play themselves due to their obligation to wear boots!! India preferred to play with barefeet but such proposal was rejected by FIFA despite their fairly successful campaign in summer Olympics 1948 without boots on the pitch.

Switzerland 1954 (one nation)

In the following edition, Poland became the only team to withdraw at that time. They declined to play against Hungary in a two-legged qualifying match mainly due to internal non-sporting reasons, which was quite a shock. As a result, the Mighty Magyar went through the final round without even having to kick the ball.

Apart from Poland, Argentina also continued to decline playing in the qualifiers. However, their absence did not instantly impact the other teams’ success in qualifying, as only two berths were available for the CONMEBOL side.

West Germany 1974 (one nation)

The last team to withdraw from the crucial stage of the World Cup leading to the direct berth in the final round was the USSR. The Eastern Europe giant rejected playing in Santiago for the second leg of the intercontinental playoff for the sake of their own security following the coup of Augusto Pinochet. The former Chilean president was infamous for executing people in the national stadium, in which the USSR and Chile were scheduled to square off.

They requested FIFA name a different venue for the match, but an agreement could not be reached. The Soviet Union was eventually disqualified, as they remained firm on their refusal at the expense of Chile’s return to the FIFA World Cup after their absence in Mexico 1970.

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Last English Managers in the Premier League’s Big Six

  The last English managers in the Premier League's Big Six mainly did not seem to have impressive spells. English managers in the Premier League are still not as many as expected. The numbers do not seem to improve. In the 2023/24, only five Englishmen were in charge of the team at the beginning of the season. Now only four remain. It is quite decreasing compared to the last five years. There were at least seven English managers from 2020 to 2023. Their number in EPL’s big six is even incredibly low. None has been appointed to be at the helm of any big clubs since Graham Potter in Chelsea two years ago. The only English boss in the top ten teams this season is Eddie Howe. The former Bournemouth boss is still in command of Newcastle United, which is not even one of the Premier League's Big Six. Next season, Manchester United could be the first elite team to be led by English managers, should Gareth Southgate accept their offer. The current Three Lions boss has been linked...

The Non-Existed Stadiums once held FIFA Club World Cup predecessor

  Two stadiums which were once used to host the games in FIFA Club World Cup predecessor, Intercontinental Cup, no longer exist today. The 2025 FIFA Club World Cup is heading to the knockout stage. Some groups have completed their games with two European sides, FC Porto and Atletico Madrid, going home early, which should be good for their players’ wellness considering the congested fixtures ahead in the 2025/26 season. This expanded FIFA CWC is unlike the previous ones, with definitely more venues to be utilised. In the old format, only two or three stadiums were used during the competition, whereas this year, there are 12 venues in total spread all across the country. In its predecessor, the Intercontinental Cup , only one stadium was used to hold the game in each edition, as it was merely a one-off clash between the European Cup/UCL and Copa Libertadores champions from 1980 to 2004. Previously, the match was held in a two-legged format. There have been plenty of stadiums ...

The Best Goalless Games in EURO, when both Goalies were Heroes

  A number of goalless games in EURO deserve better credit as they mark the top form of both goalkeepers. Goalless games are probably considered the dullest part of football. In every tournament or competition, there is bound to be one or more. Naturally, such matches never attract fans, as most would see how both sides missed shots on goals or spurned chances. However, the stalemate could also demonstrate how goalkeepers from both sides were in top form and almost equally denied the shots to keep the clean sheets. In short, some goalless games are not about the duels of forwards but the contests of the defenders on both ends of the backline, but the goalkeepers’ show. In EURO 2024, three games have resulted in a stalemate. Two of which are in the final games of Group C, when both clashes saw no goals at all. Yet, both England vs. Slovenia and Denmark vs. Serbia are not regarded as the best goalless games since both goalies’ saves were not dominant. Such matches are rare. Here ...